Every general dentist knows the pressure. Overhead is climbing. Insurance reimbursements aren't keeping pace. And yet, one of the most controllable line items in your practice, lab fees, often goes unexamined.
Industry benchmarks peg lab fees at 6–8% of collections for a well-run general practice.[1] But many practices unknowingly exceed that, and the hidden costs go beyond the invoice: remakes, extra appointments, unbillable chair time, and lost patient confidence all compound the damage.
The good news? Your lab relationship is one of the highest-leverage places to reclaim margin, without seeing more patients or cutting staff
The difference between 55% and 70% overhead equals $150,000 in additional profit on a $1M practice.
Source: Overjet / ZenOne, Dental Practice Overhead Benchmarks, 2025 [2]
The average general dental practice runs overhead between 60–65% of collections, with staff costs, supplies, and lab fees among the top three expense drivers.[2] The spread between PPO-heavy and fee-for-service practices is significant: PPO practices average $225–$275 in production per patient, while fee-for-service practices achieve $325–$400+.[3] The gap isn't just about insurance mix; it's about case efficiency and how often things go right the first time.
Remakes are the silent killer. Research published by the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network found that crown remake rates approach 4%, even under optimal conventional conditions, requiring additional time and effort from the dentist, patient, and lab for every affected case.[4] A 2024 systematic review published in Cureus (PubMed) confirmed that digital impressions consistently produce clinically superior marginal fit and reduce the need for patient revisits by eliminating the variables (distortion, shrinkage, shipping damage) that drive analog remakes.[5]
The true cost of a misaligned lab partnership shows up in four places most practices aren't measuring:
Remakes and adjustments[4] — material waste plus non-billable chair time that never appears on an invoice but hits your schedule every time.
Case acceptance drag[6] — patients who experience delays or repeat visits are less likely to accept future treatment plans.
Turnaround inefficiency — digital case submission eliminates shipping lag entirely. Files reach the lab the same day they're scanned,[5] opening production capacity without adding hours to your schedule.
Referral erosion — slow or imperfect results affect word-of-mouth in ways that don't show up on a P&L until months later.
Crown remake rates approach 4% under conventional analog conditions. Digital impressions eliminate the distortion, shrinkage, and shipping variables that drive them.
Source: National Dental Practice-Based Research Network, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2020 [4]; corroborated by Ahmed et al., Cureus (PubMed), 2024 [5]
The most productive dentist-lab relationships are built on real-time communication, shared clinical expectations, and aligned digital workflows. When your lab can view your scan the moment it's submitted, flag margin concerns before fabrication begins, and return a restoration requiring minimal adjustment. That's not just convenience, it’s profit margin protection.
“The practices that thrive long-term aren't just choosing a lab based on price. They're choosing a partner who helps them deliver predictable outcomes, reduce chair time, and keep patients coming back. That's what we've always believed our role is." – Greg Minzenmayer, Chief Commercial Officer
Denbright's seven-lab platform was built on this premise. With over 300 combined years in the industry and labs from California to the Carolinas, Denbright gives general dentists the reach of a national network with the responsiveness of a local partner.
Burbank Dental Lab has operated under the ethos of 'Make every case count' since 1979. Absolute Dental Services has completed nearly 10,000 guided surgeries, while Friendship Dental offers in-office assistance and chairside conversions as part of its service model. D&S Dental, with five decades of Midwest restorative experience, pairs local service with full CAD/CAM capability. NuArt, Jason J. Kim Dental Aesthetics, and Frontier complete a platform designed to match any case type, from posterior crowns to complex full-arch cosmetic work, with the right expertise.
Practices that transition to digital case submission report measurable gains: reduced impression material costs, faster turnaround, fewer return visits, and improved case acceptance because patients can visualize their planned result before the restoration is made.[6]
The Denbright Digital Scanner Program extends this capability across the platform, offering qualifying practices access to a premium intraoral scanner with full onboarding and lab integration support, at no cost. The math is straightforward: fewer remakes, faster delivery, better case acceptance, and a lab bill that reflects the benchmark you should be hitting.
If you're a current Denbright customer, talk to your lab rep about your remake rate, turnaround benchmarks, and whether digital case submission could close the gap. Your lab relationship should be one of the most profitable decisions you make, not just one of the most habitual ones.
Get started with Denbright Dental Labs >>
REFERENCES
[1] Overjet / ZenOne. "Dental Practice Overhead Benchmarks." Lab and supply costs combined target: 10–14% of revenue; lab fees benchmarked at 6–8%. 2025. overjet.com / zenone.com
[2] Overjet. "Average Dental Practice Overhead: Complete Breakdown by Practice Size." National median overhead: ~62% of collections. 2025. overjet.com
[3] Clerri. "28 Dental Practice Revenue Stats You Need in 2026." PPO practices average $225–$275/patient; fee-for-service practices: $325–$400+. February 2026. clerri.com
[4] McCracken M. et al. / National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. "Laboratory Technician Assessment of Crown Preparations and Impressions as Predictors of Clinical Acceptability." Crown remake rate approaches 4% under conventional conditions. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2020. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7147961
[5] Ahmed S. et al. "Digital Impressions Versus Conventional Impressions in Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review." Digital impressions consistently meet clinically acceptable marginal-fit thresholds and reduce patient revisits by eliminating distortion, shrinkage, and shipping-related variables. Cureus 16(1): e51537. PubMed, January 2024. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38304652
[6] Scott Leune Education. "Digital Dental Lab Systems: ROI Guide for New Practices." Case acceptance increases by 23% with digital same-day delivery; annual patient value is 18% higher in digital-enabled practices. April 2026. scottleune.com